Thursday, May 8, 2014
El Niño forecasters must not repeat mistakes of 1997
An editorial in New Scientist: In January, climate researchers warned that extreme El Niño events are likely to become more common as the planet warms. It now seems that the world will have a chance to rehearse for the future as early as the end of this year. A major El Niño is massing in the Pacific Ocean and is likely to cause cyclones, tornadoes, droughts, floods and sea level changes across the world (see "World is unprepared for major El Niño later this year").
Many leading scientists say the approaching El Niño looks similar in magnitude to the huge one that started in 1997 and went on to kill tens of thousands of people and cause tens of billions of dollars of damage. But you won't hear that sort of warning from official forecasters. They agree that an El Niño is likely, but are saying little about its potential strength.
Why is that? One of the key reasons for the devastation of 1997 was excess caution among forecasters. A major UN study published in 2000 revealed that for forecasters, an incorrect prediction is more embarrassing than no prediction at all. We may be seeing the same failings today.
There is still a chance that the threat will dissipate. But we won't know for sure until it is too late to prepare properly. If governments and emergency services are to be given enough time, they need full and frank forecasts now.
Clear forecasting is important for another reason: the response to a big El Niño will be a test of how ready the world is for climate change. The most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reiterated that we must prepare for climate variability rather than for any particular threat. El Niño is the biggest source of climate variability we know about....
Friends and neighbors pitch in to save the belongings of a condominium in Laguna Niguel, California, that was heavily damaged in a landslide resulting from El Nino storms. Two luxury homes above the condos collapsed when the hillside gave way. Photo by DAVE GATLEY/FEMA News Photo
Many leading scientists say the approaching El Niño looks similar in magnitude to the huge one that started in 1997 and went on to kill tens of thousands of people and cause tens of billions of dollars of damage. But you won't hear that sort of warning from official forecasters. They agree that an El Niño is likely, but are saying little about its potential strength.
Why is that? One of the key reasons for the devastation of 1997 was excess caution among forecasters. A major UN study published in 2000 revealed that for forecasters, an incorrect prediction is more embarrassing than no prediction at all. We may be seeing the same failings today.
There is still a chance that the threat will dissipate. But we won't know for sure until it is too late to prepare properly. If governments and emergency services are to be given enough time, they need full and frank forecasts now.
Clear forecasting is important for another reason: the response to a big El Niño will be a test of how ready the world is for climate change. The most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reiterated that we must prepare for climate variability rather than for any particular threat. El Niño is the biggest source of climate variability we know about....
Friends and neighbors pitch in to save the belongings of a condominium in Laguna Niguel, California, that was heavily damaged in a landslide resulting from El Nino storms. Two luxury homes above the condos collapsed when the hillside gave way. Photo by DAVE GATLEY/FEMA News Photo
Labels:
El_Nino-Southern Oscillation,
governance,
warning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment