Thursday, April 18, 2013
The dirty little secret to tackling climate change
Cathy Alexander at Crikey (Australia): Forget the carbon price, forget the opposition’s Direct Action climate plan. Australia could probably meet its targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without either, provided we did one thing. But you won’t hear the politicians talk about it.
A statistical analysis by Crikey, based on data released this week, indicates that if Australia’s high population growth rate were reined in, the country would already be meeting its targets to cut pollution. In fact, we’d probably be under those targets.
The federal government’s data on greenhouse gas emissions for the December quarter points to the major impact the population boom has had on Australia’s emissions. Here’s the Crikey number-crunching that shows why it might be time to talk about the environmental impact of Australia’s growing population. (This is a crude statistical analysis, but you won’t find the government — both major parties support and plan for significant population growth — doing it. So we had a go.)
Australia’s per capita emissions actually dropped between 1989 and 2012. But the population increased by 35% during that period, and overall national emissions soared by 32%. That took national greenhouse gas emissions from 418 megatonnes a year in 1990 to 552 megatonnes in 2012 (a megatonne is 1 million tonnes).
...“The short answer is that we may well be meeting that (emissions) target already if we did not have the population boom.”...
A crowd in Sydney, shot by Bidgee, Wikimedia Commons, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Australia license
A statistical analysis by Crikey, based on data released this week, indicates that if Australia’s high population growth rate were reined in, the country would already be meeting its targets to cut pollution. In fact, we’d probably be under those targets.
The federal government’s data on greenhouse gas emissions for the December quarter points to the major impact the population boom has had on Australia’s emissions. Here’s the Crikey number-crunching that shows why it might be time to talk about the environmental impact of Australia’s growing population. (This is a crude statistical analysis, but you won’t find the government — both major parties support and plan for significant population growth — doing it. So we had a go.)
Australia’s per capita emissions actually dropped between 1989 and 2012. But the population increased by 35% during that period, and overall national emissions soared by 32%. That took national greenhouse gas emissions from 418 megatonnes a year in 1990 to 552 megatonnes in 2012 (a megatonne is 1 million tonnes).
...“The short answer is that we may well be meeting that (emissions) target already if we did not have the population boom.”...
A crowd in Sydney, shot by Bidgee, Wikimedia Commons, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Australia license
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Thank you for another informative site. The place else may just I am getting
that kind of information written in such an ideal
means? I have a project that I'm simply now running on, and I have been at the glance out for such information.
my page ... tips on how to lose Weight fast
Post a Comment