Climate and Insurance has an interview with
Commenting on Massachussetts v. EPA, a recent case before the Supreme Court, Guzy says: “I think the ruling will have two consequences: first, it will strengthen the hand of those who argue that federal legislation is needed to clarify this area, because the decision leaves EPA with few outs from going forward with regulation; and second, the Court’s ‘standing’ ruling may loosen a floodgate of litigation about the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, bringing many in industry into the fold of becoming proponents of clarifying legislation.”
1 comment:
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. I want to share news aboutcollege which is offers beyond-the- classroom experience to students in the rapidly-expanding industries of Health Care, Criminal Justice, Business, and Computers. Don't miss out on great career opportunities.
Post a Comment