Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Holy land underwater -- a Carbon Based original
Sure, the Hollywood piety and celestial choruses are grating. Too many of these middle eastern Jews are blond and speak with plummy British accents. The pace stretches out much too long, especially for us nonbelievers. Von Sydow struggles bravely to breathe some life into his Gospel-only solemnities. Everybody laughs at John Wayne's line reading as the centurion at the foot of the cross.
But many of the performances are superb. Donald Pleasance portrays Satan as an ineffectual geezer who doesn't have much heart for tempting Jesus, but turns powerful and malevolent when inciting a crowd or steering Jesus to his fate. Claude Rains does a memorably creepy rendition of Herod doddering on his throne as he orders the death of children. Charlton Heston devours his role as John the Baptist, and was rightly proud of it.
But what interests me most are the locations, beautifully shot by Loyal Griggs and William C. Mellor, in Southern Utah near the Glen Canyon Dam in Page, Arizona. The message board on the film at the Internet Movie Data Base contains several sniffs that the Utah desert is much dryer than the ancient Palestine, which is certainly true, but irrelevant. These desert vistas are otherworldly, some of them of a scale and significance that you might wonder why you haven't seen them before.
The reason is, many of them no longer exist. The locations vanished not because of climate change, but as a result of human decisions. Weeks before the filming of the Greatest Story in March of 1963, the gates of the Glen Canyon dam closed, trapping the river. Many of the locations would soon vanish under Lake Powell.
A major environmental controversy swirled around that dam. David Brower, head of the Sierra Club, battled the Bureau of Reclamation's plans to contain the Colorado River. The Club argued that the dam would destroy a unique wilderness, and set ominous precedent for plundering America's protected lands.
In the mid-1950s, the Bureau of Reclamation agreed to forego two other dams, but only if they could proceed unopposed with dams at Flaming Gorge and Glen Canyon. The Sierra Club agreed. Congress authorized the Colorado River Storage Project in April 1956, and groundbreaking for the Glen Canyon followed quickly.
At first, many celebrated this outcome a major victory for the American environmentalists -- after all, they'd stopped two dams. But in a few months Brower regretted the Sierra Club's compromise. With the dam under construction, he traveled down the Colorado River and was shocked by the beauty and grandeur of the landscape he had consigned to submersion. Brower later wrote, "Glen Canyon died, and I was partly responsible for its needless death. ... Neither you nor I, nor anyone else, knew it well enough to insist that at all costs it should endure. When we began to find out it was too late."
In the Sierra Club's magazine in 2000, he reflected, "But as surely as we made a mistake years ago, we can reverse it now. We can drain Lake Powell and let the Colorado River run through the dam that created it, bringing Glen Canyon and the wonder of its side canyons back to life. We can let the river do what it needs to do downstream in the Grand Canyon itself."
In addition to the loss of a landscape and an ecosystem, the environmentalist objections stressed the inefficient water use the dam made of the Colorado River. The larger the size of Lake Powell, the greater the volume of water lost to evaporation. "Draining Lake Powell means more water for the Colorado River states and Mexico, especially Colorado and Utah. The hundreds of millions of dollars now being lost, growing to billions in the future, should be enough to give even Bill Gates pause," Brower said. " ... The sooner we begin, the sooner lost paradises will begin to recover."
The Glen Canyon Dam still stands, but Brower's counterintuitive strictures against dams are especially relevant for the parched Southwest, where larger reservoirs result in more water loss. The Southwest needs the water more than ever.
But even if we make only correct decisions, the long-range outcome will probably be the same. We'll need to move people out of the desert.
I suspect that a number of decisions we make about climate change are going to follow this pattern -- environmentalists will support or oppose a project, based on their knowledge at the time, only to discover something later that makes them change their mind. Long-range impacts are impossible to gauge, even for high-status glamour projects, such as building dams. And once we reach that point where we know the consequences, it will probably be too late. To add to the sting, there won't be a biblical movie being filmed to inadvertently document what we're going to lose.
In the moment we make our decisions, we never know the ultimate outcome. At the George Stevens version of the last supper, getting exasperated with the gnomic utterances, one of the disciples says, "Speak plainly and speak no proverbs." Good luck to anyone trying to wangle a straight answer out of Jesus, or out of the future -- we won't know the meaning until much later, when the waters are rising.
Paria, Utah, where other moviews were filmed, but not The Greatest Story Ever Told. Shot by John Fowler, Wikimedia Commons via Flickr, under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license
Monday, August 15, 2011
'Major role' for mosques in Indonesian disasters
"These religious leaders will be trained and inspired to touch the humanitarian side and cooperation between people for support, development and relief of suffering... as their message is so effective and well-received and applied by communities," he said. A recent report by IRI, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), a traditional Sunni Islam organization in Indonesia, is the first to research the potential role in a disaster for the country's 600,000 mosques.
...Mosques have been used in many of Indonesia's disasters, large and small, from the 2004 tsunami that left 167,000 dead in the country, to the earthquake in 2009 that left thousands without homes in Padang in West Sumatra. "The mosque is a key element in disaster-risk reduction and a key element to save lives," Ignacio Leon-Garcia, head of OCHA in Indonesia, said. "This is something of which Muslims should be proud."
...The report suggests four primary areas of disaster-risk reduction for mosques: storage of supplies, coordination of a relief effort, distribution of supplies and a place for therapy and long-term healing. Avianto Muhtadi, chairman of climate change and disaster management at NU, said after reading the report he began to weigh the role of disaster response when planning buildings. "We should build mosques keeping these extra needs in mind," he said, adding that the number of bathrooms and open spaces should be considered....
Local mosque in East Cipinang, Jakarta Indonesia. Shot by Jonathan McIntosh,, Wikimedia Commons, under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license
Sunday, July 3, 2011
Climate change in Philippines now serious matter for Church, military
The Inquirer News (Philippines): Religious, military and government leaders are one in saying that Filipinos should now be more proactive in caring for the environment to combat the ill-effects of climate change.“We now have to pay attention to climate change,” Davao Archbishop Fernando Capalla told the Philippine Daily Inquirer in the aftermath of Tuesday’s flashflood that killed at least 30 people in four villages here. “Some people don’t believe it’s coming. The balance of the environment is now disturbed and so we have flashflood, tornadoes,” Capalla said.
The prelate said he would write a pastoral letter encouraging people to plant trees “because our survival depends on it. Even the rich will not survive if we don’t have environmental protection,” he said.
He also appealed to subdivision developers to refrain from cutting trees, which help absorb water. While admitting that the city is helpless against flashfloods, Mayor Sara Duterte said residents living in low-lying areas should now start “to fortify their houses and even elevate these” against flooding.
She said the local government was addressing the problem of flooding but would need the cooperation of the community...
Monday, March 10, 2008
Vatican urges global alliance to combat climate change
The church tells me so, from the Independent Catholic News: Archbishop Celestino Migliore, Holy See permanent observer to the UN has called for countries to work together help avert climate change. The 62nd UN General Assembly met in He said: "Moreover, markets must be encouraged to patronise 'green economics' and not to sustain demand for goods whose very production causes environmental degradation. Consumers must be aware that their consumption patterns have direct impact on the health of the environment". "Indeed, the challenge of climate change is at once individual, local, national and global. Accordingly, it urges a multilevel co-ordinated response, with mitigation and adaptation programmes simultaneously individual, local, national and global in their vision and scope. ... It demands a global alliance for the adoption of a co-ordinated international political strategy towards a healthy environment for all".
A cupola in the Vatican, shot by Janine Pohl, Wikimedia Commons

