Climate and Insurance has an interview with
Commenting on Massachussetts v. EPA, a recent case before the Supreme Court, Guzy says: “I think the ruling will have two consequences: first, it will strengthen the hand of those who argue that federal legislation is needed to clarify this area, because the decision leaves EPA with few outs from going forward with regulation; and second, the Court’s ‘standing’ ruling may loosen a floodgate of litigation about the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, bringing many in industry into the fold of becoming proponents of clarifying legislation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment