Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Anthropogenic aerosols caused global temperature drop in 1950s
Nadya Anscombe in Environmental Research Web: More than 50% of the decrease in global mean near-surface temperature observed between 1950 and 1965 was due to anthropogenic aerosols, according to researchers in the UK.
Laura Wilcox and colleagues of the University of Reading and the Met Office used the most recent climate models to confirm that aerosols played a large role in the temperature decrease in that timeframe. They have, for the first time, quantified the size of the contribution made by anthropogenic aerosols, as opposed to natural aerosols.
“The idea that aerosols cause cooling is not new,” Wilcox told environmentalresearchweb. “Previous work with single models has suggested that it is the indirect effect of aerosols – their interaction with clouds – that accounts for most of their cooling influence. We have shown this to be the case for multiple models. Without the indirect effect, the models are unable to reproduce the cooling in the 1950s and 1960s. By running the models with all climate-forcing agents fixed, except anthropogenic aerosols, we have for the first time been able to quantify the contribution of anthropogenic aerosols.”
The results, said Wilcox, are striking. “Even in such a short timeframe, and taking into account the uncertainties in the models we used, the evidence is clear – anthropogenic aerosols were the main contributor to the global mean temperature drop between 1950–1965,” she said. “Aerosols could have a more significant effect on global mean temperature than greenhouse gases, and with anthropogenic aerosols expected to decrease in the coming years, our findings have implications for future policy.”
The research also showed that the cooling effect of anthropogenic aerosols on temperature is so great that it cancelled out the warming effects due to greenhouse gases to give an overall global cooling between 1950 and 1965....
Aerosol pollution over India in 2001, shot by NASA
Laura Wilcox and colleagues of the University of Reading and the Met Office used the most recent climate models to confirm that aerosols played a large role in the temperature decrease in that timeframe. They have, for the first time, quantified the size of the contribution made by anthropogenic aerosols, as opposed to natural aerosols.
“The idea that aerosols cause cooling is not new,” Wilcox told environmentalresearchweb. “Previous work with single models has suggested that it is the indirect effect of aerosols – their interaction with clouds – that accounts for most of their cooling influence. We have shown this to be the case for multiple models. Without the indirect effect, the models are unable to reproduce the cooling in the 1950s and 1960s. By running the models with all climate-forcing agents fixed, except anthropogenic aerosols, we have for the first time been able to quantify the contribution of anthropogenic aerosols.”
The results, said Wilcox, are striking. “Even in such a short timeframe, and taking into account the uncertainties in the models we used, the evidence is clear – anthropogenic aerosols were the main contributor to the global mean temperature drop between 1950–1965,” she said. “Aerosols could have a more significant effect on global mean temperature than greenhouse gases, and with anthropogenic aerosols expected to decrease in the coming years, our findings have implications for future policy.”
The research also showed that the cooling effect of anthropogenic aerosols on temperature is so great that it cancelled out the warming effects due to greenhouse gases to give an overall global cooling between 1950 and 1965....
Aerosol pollution over India in 2001, shot by NASA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment