![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnxTUWABLAYmd9yZIIgZ1k6mJ-OR_CZfGb02ntWhIGSR1sC68sifNUeVhiu6wLLMW9AgC9UNoJaKg_8tN_2vzkk9AaJu2aFO0j54MzJIHOOcpxo1SZ7uNIxcrpVD3Vb7pRoqgdHi0xJxk/s200/800px-Thinopyrum_intermedium_field.jpg)
The team's recommendations, first published as a 2010 report by the U.S. National Research Council, appear as a Policy Forum piece in the May 6 issue of the journal Science. Lead author on the paper is John Reganold, Regents Professor of soil science and agroecology at Washington State University, Pullman.
"For decades, the agricultural industry, research community and government, have looked to incremental improvements in agricultural procedures and technologies for achieving advances in productivity," said Deanne Meyer, a Cooperative Extension livestock waste management specialist in the UC Davis Department of Animal Science and a member of the research team.
She noted that such incremental improvements have included adoption of two-year crop rotations, precision agriculture technologies, classically bred and genetically engineered crops, and reduced- or no-tillage management systems.
"While all of these have resulted in important improvements, it's become apparent that as modern agriculture also grapples with important issues such as global climate change, biodiversity, resource conservation and public health problems, a more transformative approach is needed," she said.
Such an approach would balance production goals with long-term sustainability concerns involving the environmental, social and economic impacts of agriculture. It would focus on a "whole-system redesign" that would address policy and market issues, as well as technological issues, the researchers recommend in their report…
Field of ripening intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) at the Land Institute's research farm in Salina, Kansas. Shot by Dehaan, Wikimedia Commons, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States license
No comments:
Post a Comment